On the other hand, it'll have much harsher recoil then a minor 9mm. However, a 9mm bullet can still make major (.38 Super). This way, the playing field is somewhat equal. A 9mm typically has much less recoil then a. The reason for the two different classes has to do with scoring.
Mac 10 9mm single vs double full#
To full understand the DPF theory, one must understand the background to the ISPC Power Factor. Personally, I favor making as big of a hole in my target as I can. 45 debate is one of the eternal issues for the gun culture to talk about. as we don’t have a way to accurately measure that. I don’t have a formula that factors in Hydro Static Shock. (but it should, damn it!) The speed guys continue to talk about Hydro Static Shock. I am not suggesting you compare Rifle calibers to Handgun Calibers in terms of effectiveness - but it is useful when comparing Rifles to Rifles. Putting Egos aside - I think that this is a simple and easy way to compare loads. it will hit harder that a smaller, lighter one. You have a bigger caliber, heavier bullet. 223, so these numbers should not surprise you. But I think this is showing a more accurate picture. Now, the Speed Freak guys that think faster is better might be getting a little irked here. For Rifles, don’t divide by 1000… Divide it by 100. The DPF Formula works on rifles as well, but you need to change the scale. 45 caliber, 1650 FPS speed = DPF of 222.75! Too Bad that. Don’t get pissed at me if your choice of a carry package looks wimpy. Smaller caliber bullets will have smaller numbers, and mouse guns will look more like mouse guns that they are on this scale. 355 or what ever your bullet is actually sized at. Once you starting running this formula with different calibers and loads, you will see some interesting results:īullet Weight in Grains, Times Caliber, Times Velocity, Divided by 1000 = Defensive Power Factor or DPF for short.įor 9MM and such you of course use its actual measured Caliber. So the numbers are going to look different, but bare with me. IPSC's goal was to create a certain level that allows people to compete on a more even playing field. (more on that later) So a simple mathematical formula like what the IPSC uses should be of some help. I think the M&S study has some merit, but the study, due to its critical flaws, has been debunked as junk science. One of the most popular methods of comparison is the M&S OSS%. I have been thinking about this for a few minutes now, and I think I have another similar formula that will be more accurate when looking at and comparing different loads. I personally think Caliber is a CRITICAL FACTOR in a defensive bullet. This is an easy formula that one can use when comparing loads. This led to the IPSC's Power Factor, which is simply Bullet Weight in Grains, Times Velocity, Divided by 1,000. I was talking with one of my brothers about some different calibers and velocities. Carefully managed the MAC-10, Micro UZI, PDW, and TMP are high powered accurate 'Assault' class machine pistols.Īnd BTW, none of the weapons in any version of True Combat, any FPS realism shooter, Action/Arcade or Tactical Realism potraying modern warfare include any weapons that use "Clips" they all use " MAGAZINES"! Not a big deal to some, but it's a distinction that's as on/off as calling your Hard Drive a "Floppy". While the Ingram MAC-10 fires more powerful ammunition, it climbs even more dramatically, vibrates like a blender full of rocks, and is empty almost instantly if you don't have a light trigger finger.
Mac 10 9mm single vs double software#
We had to mitigate the real rate of fire of the weapon because the id Software engine(s) net-code can not support rates of fire this high, the results are similar. The best tactics using the UZI are to counter-intuitively rush under fire - getting as close as possible as fast as possible to mitigate the inaccuracy of the weapon. Tne Micro UZI will be most effective when moving and maneuvering for cover, empliying stealth and using ammunition judiciously - the UZI is an enormously powerful and fun weapon. To be effective you will have to very carefully manage ammunition and aim. The sheer intensity of the Micro UZI's 'high volume' fire is well balanced by its being very inaccurate, the fact that you will have an empty magazine in under three seconds if you spray, and that it's 9mm rounds are some of the lowest power projectiles in the game as they are fired from a very shortest barrel weapon in the game. The ICS Micro UZI fires at a much higher rate very much like the real weapon (though still not nearly the astonishing 1,250 RPM of a real Micro UZI) and is very deadly at close range.
0 kommentar(er)
